|
The 10
Stupidest Religious Beliefs
So,
coming into this week, we had a couple of different
articles nearly finished. Both
were
impeccably researched, finely nuanced stances on topics we knew would
be of
interest to the many cultured scholars in our audience.
But then we heard that a
Dutch
lunatic built a giant replica
of Noah’s Ark,
so we decided to
just rip on stupid people again. If
you
would have preferred something a bit more elegant, please address your
complaints
to wild-eyed-loony-of-the-Lowland-Countries Johan Huibers.
Huibers, a Biblical Literalist,
says that, based on his
faith in the Covenant of the Rainbow signed, sealed, and delivered by
God after
the “last” Flood, he isn’t concerned
about Holland being flooded again—which is
ironic, considering that, at the rate the polar icecaps are melting,
Holland is in fact actually
going to be flooded in like… we don’t
know, three weeks or
something—but instead built the Ark to renew waning Dutch
interest in
Christianity.
Dutch interest in Christianity
is waning? Hey, we
wonder if that has anything to do
with why Holland
is really fun and
people go there all the time. Well,
regardless, this is a trend Huibers hopes to reverse.
And what better way to renew people’s
faith
could there be than with a giant-ass
reminder of the reason they figured out the whole thing was stupid in
the first
place? We
are most definitely not on
your side here, Johan, but if we were, we would suggest maybe, like,
printing
up some quality t-shirts with some really nice stuff that Jesus said on
them. But hey, you
chose to go with what
is effectively a football-field-sized banner reading
“CHRISTIANITY OFFICIALLY
REQUIRES YOU TO BE MILDLY RETARDED,” and that’s
cool too.
Actually, Huibers’s
replica is slightly less than the length
of a football field, and only half
the length of the “real” Ark
as
described in the Book of Genesis.
Hey…
Hold on a second, we want to
try something real quick.
1585:
Man, there are a lot of
numbers in this… Okay,
it’s ringing.
Johan
Huibers: Goeiedag.
1585:
Goeiedag. Johan
Huibers?
Johan
Huibers: Ja, is hij.
1585:
Ah, goed. Spreekt
jij Engels, Johan?
Johan
Huibers: Yes,
actually, I do.
1585:
Oh, good. Because
we just wanted to ask you, did the fact
that, even though you
were using modern tools and shipbuilding techniques, you could still
only get
your Ark to be about half the size the Bible says the actual Ark was,
if you
wanted it to, you know, not fall the fuck apart or sink instantly, did
that
ever make you suspect even for a second that, you know, maybe the whole
thing
never really happened?
Johan
Huibers: Oh,
goodness no! In
fact, the overwhelming evidence that the
entire idea is blatantly impossible beyond the utmost straining of even
a very
young child’s credulity just made me all the more convinced
that is it definitely what actually
happened!
1585:
Uh-huh…
And why is that again?
Johan
Huibers: Well, the
fact of it is that I literally have
shit for brains.
1585:
You don’t say!
Johan
Huibers: Indeed I
do.
1585:
Honestly, now, shit? If we were to open up
your head this very day, we would actually find some sort of excrement
inside,
in lieu of a human brain?
Johan
Huibers: Hand to
God.
1585:
Yes, of course it is, now
that we think about
it. Oh,
well—we had to try. Doe
voorzichtig, Johan.
Johan
Huibers: Doe-diddly-voorzichtig
te jou, gebuurino! (click)
1585:
D’oh!
Stupid Huibers!
Okay, evidently that was
pointless. But the
“banner” crack leading into it got us
thinking, what if we were to rank
various Western religious beliefs according to how
stupid they are? In
the
past, we’ve had a lot of fun with religion in general, but
never actually
stopped to consider the fact that some religious
things—Noah’s Ark,
for example—are clearly way
stupider
than others. Exactly
how retarded would someone
have to be to
put stock in one of them as opposed to another?
Fine, we didn’t just
think of that—we wrote it first, which
is why it’s the title of the essay.
Anyway, here are our results:
THE 10 STUPIDEST RELIGIOUS
BELIEFS
10. Intercession /
Predestination (select events being caused by prayer, or all events
being
“God’s will”)
9.
Manifestations (face
of Jesus in grilled cheese, potato chip, etc.)
8.
Creationism /
Intelligent Design
7.
“Young Earth”
Hypothesis / Non-Existence of Dinosaurs / Coexistence of Dinosaurs with
Man
6.
Existence of the
Devil at all
5.
Demonic Possession
/ Exorcism
4.
Rapture / Second-Coming
/ Apocalypse Scenarios / “The Antichrist”
3.
Geocentrism
2.
The Tower
of Babel
1.
Noah’s Ark
/ The Flood
Some
Notes on the
Selection Process:
This
list was actually fairly
difficult to construct—not due
to lack of material, obviously, but rather due to the fact that many of
these
beliefs are so intertwined with one another that it’s hard to
decide when to
separate them into different entries.
As
you can see, we have three separate entries in a row that are all just
varying
degrees of believing in “the Devil,” and also
granted autonomous status to #7
despite the fact that it’s just a side effect of believing in
#1.
We should also mention that,
when it came to simple Biblical
literalism in general—which obviously yields thousands
of individual preposterous beliefs—we narrowed it down by
considering only those events that
are supposed by believers to have caused
something to happen, as in the cases of #s 8, 2, and 1.
So, while it may be just as crazy to believe
that, say, Sodom and Gomorrah
really
happened, this belief was not considered for the list, because it
doesn’t provide the basis for an
antiscientific
alternate explanation of any specific phenomenon.
We would also like to point out
that we only considered
beliefs that originated with
religion, and not beliefs that originated elsewhere but which are
sometimes justified with religious
rhetoric. Thus, for
example, a Southern racist’s belief
that God is “against” interracial
dating—while phenomenally stupid—was
inadmissible, since it is simply a case of an extrareligious
belief’s being
tacked on to religion.
Additionally, we
weren’t sure how to treat beliefs that are
logically implied (in terms of internal logic, obviously) by other
beliefs. We ranked
belief in the Devil
as pretty stupid, and indeed there are lots of Christians who believe
some
pretty stupid shit and still
don’t
believe that there’s a fucking Devil—but,
then again, many of those people do
say they believe that there’s a Hell,
so how do they explain…?
We guess those
are the people who pull some metaphor shit and say that Hell is
“distance from
God” or something. You
know, the same
people who say “I believe that God is Love, and Love exists,
so therefore God
exists,” which, of course, could just as easily be
“I believe that God is That
Pencil Over There, and That Pencil Over There exists,
so…”
Finally, we would like to
comment on the extent to which the
concern of how many people still
believe in any given thing was taken into account when determining the
pecking
order of craziness. Overall,
this was
not done with any consistency. We
did
take into account the fact that many people who are otherwise normal
still pray in the decision to place
Intercession at the bottom of the list—but, on the other
hand, even though more people
believe in Noah’s Ark than
in Geocentrism, Noah’s Ark is just SO
batshit insane that we could not justify putting it anywhere other than
the
top.
Oh, and for all you trivia
buffs, be aware that this list technically
isn’t even the real ten.
That list appears
elsewhere on the site,
but it was just a bunch of shit about not cooking a calf in its
mother’s milk,
and assorted nitpickings about what is or is not supposed to be
leavened, so
everyone forgot about it.*
Now, people often
don’t understand why it is that we, or
other atheists, have such a problem with the concept of God. After all, belief in any
of the crazy shit
listed above isn’t the same thing
as
believing in God itself, right? If someone believes in
some version of the
God-concept, but no further crazy
stuff that conflicts directly with science and so forth, then
what’s the harm
in that?
Our answer is as simple as it
is shocking: There
are hardly any of those people.
This may sound alarmist or
paranoid—like we are making an
assertion that can’t possibly be true.
We have all been taught to believe that the vast
majority of theists are simply theists, and
that’s it. But
the statistics belie
this. Take the
stats on evolution, for example: all
polls on the subject indicate that around 51% of the U.S.
population are Creationists, and 15% believe firmly in evolution. The third group waxes and
wanes in size based
on whether the third option is given as “Not Sure,”
“Evolution Happened, but
Was Guided by God,” or what-have-you—but virtually
all of the give-and-take there is
with the Evolution group; we have never
seen a poll where the Creationist numbers dipped below 50%. Now, when you factor in
the fact that
somewhere around 10% of the population are atheists (all
of whom, obviously, believe in evolution), this means that the
statement “the majority of Americans
who
believe in God at all are Creationists” is a true
statement. Factor
the “Not Sure”/“God Guided
Evolution”
group in, and you end up with the even more alarming fact that
“only 5% of Americans who believe in
God also
believe firmly in evolution.”
Okay, whatever, you might say. Evolution
is complicated
and hard to
understand, and there’s a psychological imperative to
disbelieve it, because
believing that they were created special by God makes people feel good
about
themselves. Someone
who doesn’t believe
in evolution isn’t necessarily insane, right?
It’s not like that Noah’s Ark
bullshit, right?
Yeah, great… Except
that, according to a 2004 ABC
News poll, the percentage of Americans who believe in Noah’s
Ark—this is Noah’s Ark,
now, so we are talking about
people who believe that one guy
built
a 450-foot wooden boat and somehow
put two of every animal on it, including the animals living on
continents that hadn’t been discovered yet (which means he also must have discovered and explored all of the Americas and Australia, not to
mention climbed the
Himalayas what for to fetch the yaks), and kept them all alive and fed
and playing
nicely with one another for forty days, and then got them back to where
they
all lived, and okay fuck this, because we refuse to be reduced to pointing out flaws in the story of Noah’s
Ark (although here
is a link to a piece by someone who was
good enough to
do this)—is…
60%.
That’s sixty
percent. Even
higher,
somehow, than the number that believe in Creation.
And, as we think we may already have said a
couple of times, this is Noah’s Ark
we’re talking about. This
is not like
saying a quick prayer that your favorite team will win, during the
final
minutes of the game when the score’s really close and
you’re all excited. We
are talking about something that is
effectively equivalent to schizophrenia.
Subtract the 10% who are atheists once again, and
you are left with the
completely incontrovertible statement that “two-thirds
of the Americans who believe in God at all are literally
insane.”
Oh, no, wait… Okay,
sorry, we fucked up. That
should have
been: “AT LEAST two-thirds of the Americans who
believe
in God at all are literally insane.” Our apologies once again. We do hate making errors
in our calculations.
And if you think
we’re being unfair, we would love to know
why. We are not
talking about people who
have heard of Noah’s Ark,
or who
think it’s a pleasant story,
or who are
happy to sing songs about it when
they are in church—we are talking about people who think that
it literally happened; about people
who
actually believe that any day now someone is going to find fossilized
wood from
it on Mt. Ararat. If
it is not fair to
say that such a person is insane—not in a hyperbolic,
sarcastic sense, where
the word is used as a general put-down, but literally
insane, in the technical sense of being unable to distinguish fantasy
from
reality—then who is
insane? What does
“insane” mean, if not
this?
Sixty
percent. A substantial majority of the people who currently reside in the United
States.
At this point, many of you are
probably about to ask, “But
isn’t this all getting better?
Surely,
these numbers are lower than they used to be.
Even if the numbers seem alarming in isolation, we
would certainly see a
general downward trend if we were to examine them over the years,
right?”
Well, we’re sorry to
tell you that this shirt is
blacknot. The
percentage of Americans
who believe in evolution is lower now than it was thirty
years ago, and recent years have seen a substantial spike in
belief in the Devil, which rose from 63% in 1997 to 71% in 2004. Furthermore, though we
tend to think of old
farts as being the most crazily religious, only 67% of people over 70
believe
in the Devil, while the number for 18-34-year-old is 79%.
Okay, fine, we’re
smart enough to know that this is being
thrown off by the fact that rich people live longer, so a greater
proportion of
people over 70 who are still alive are educated than in the general
population
(which is just one more demonstration of the fact that statistics never
prove
anything, unless we’re the ones using them), but in any case
this is still
pretty fucked up right here. Seriously,
four out of five
18-34-year-olds believe
in the fucking Devil?! Hold on a second, we need
to make another
phone call.
1585:
Okay, it’s
ringing… still
ringing…
Jerry
Seinfeld: Hello?
1585:
Hey, Jerry Seinfeld?
Jerry
Seinfeld: This is
he.
1585:
Hey, what’s up,
it’s 1585. We
need you to come over here and say “Who
are these people?”
Jerry
Seinfeld: What? Fifteen-eighty… Huh?
What
is this?
1585:
Oh, we’re just
this totally awesome
website. Anyway,
we’re in the middle of
this one essay, and we can’t really go into it, but trust us,
it would be pretty
funny if you said “Who are these people?” right now.
Jerry
Seinfeld: What?
1585:
You know, “Who aaaaaaaaare
these people?”
Jerry
Seinfeld: Oh, that.
Well, you know, I never really said that
much. That was more
people doing
impressions of me. Which
I never minded, because, you see,
there are four
stages of comedy: the first is making your friends laugh, the
second—
1585:
Yeah, we know.
Jerry
Seinfeld: So,
anyway, what’s the essay about?
1585:
Well, the part we needed
you for was about
the Devil, but—
Jerry
Seinfeld: The Devil. What’s the deal
with the Devil? Why
does he carry that pitchfork? It’s
like, is he baling some hay, is he
chasing Frankenstein…?
Because as far as I know, those are
the only two things you can do
with a pitchf—
1585:
This has become more
trouble than it’s worth.
So, why are we telling you all
this? Just for a
larf? Not exactly. While we have never denied
the fact that mocking the
stupid is
objectively a good time, what needs to be uppermost in our minds here
is the
fact that ridiculous beliefs almost always yield empirically
demonstrable
terrible results. For
example, 44% of
Americans believe that the world will end sometime in the next 50
years—good
luck convincing those people to recycle, or conserve energy…
or rainforests or
wetlands or anything. And this,
as we’ve said elsewhere, may in fact be the point—among
the skeptical minority, the tendency is still to assume that the crazy
belief originates with religion;
but the
frequency with which ridiculous religious claims just
so happen to provide believers with an excuse not to have to
do what smart people tell them to do lends a good deal of credence to
the
hypothesis that being an asshole is
the cause and religious
beliefs the effect,
rather than the other way around…
All
the more reason never to feel the least bit bad about openly and viciously
excoriating them.
Religious types are always
complaining about how
fancy-book-learning types, effete corps of intellectual snobs, and the
like,
are encroaching on the private business of their faith (this is
actually their
second-favorite thing to complain about; their first-favorite thing to
complain
about, ironically, is people who complain
about things). What
they seem not to realize is that
this is in fact
impossible not to do for anyone who
ever wants to have a conversation about anything.
Let’s examine the
situation of the faithful’s Public Enemy
Number One: college professors. Do
religious people have any idea how impossible it is to be a teacher and never
say anything that contradicts religion?
We mean, the Bible clearly states that the
value of pi is exactly 3, so right off the bat the math guy is fucked,
as is
the Art teacher if any art involving circles ever comes up (actually,
the Bible
doesn’t say that “pi is exactly three;”
it says that a particular cauldron is
10 cubits across and 30 cubits around, which is clearly an
approximation, and
there’s no problem at all if you take into account the
thickness of the rim, but
the funny part about this is, many Christians refuse to accept this
explanation
and still insist that pi is exactly
three just to be dicks, even though
the flap
over this “mistake” originated
with
people whose intent was to find something in the Bible that is clearly
false).
But let’s say a
discussion about, say, body image or people
being too sexy or something (since these topics account for
approximately 94%
of all discussions that have taken place in college classrooms during
the past
fifteen years) breaks out in an English or Sociology or Psychology
class. Religious
types would be quick to object that
it isn’t the place of an English or Sociology or Psychology
professor to be
“teaching evolution”—but how the fuck is
someone supposed to lead a discussion
about why human beings find certain
things attractive and not
bring
up evolution?
Or suppose an interesting point
about etymology comes up—is
a professor to be expected not to make mention of the fact that
languages
evolve from and inform one another, because it contradicts the Tower-of-Babel explanation of where
languages come from? It
may seem like
this example is a joke, but this shit comes up.
And it has been coming up more
and more and more
since… since…
oh, let’s
just pick the arbitrary date of January 20th,
2001.
And in February of 2006,
Republican Arizona state senator Thayer
Verschoor introduced a bill that would have afforded college students
the right
to refuse to read any books or complete any assignments that they found
morally
objectionable—which, obviously, was code for making it
out-and-out illegal for colleges in
that state to
contradict, or challenge, or even roughly
jostle religion. And
in case anyone
is assuming that this initiative must have been prompted by some
incident of an
“extreme” nature, be advised that the movement
started with a religious
student’s refusal to read The Ice
Storm,
on the grounds that there is sex in
it. (The bill, by
the way, was passed by
the Higher Education and Rules Committees but, mercifully, failed in
the open
senate… by three votes. And so no-one can accuse
us of not giving
credit where credit is due, we want to mention that the Arizona
state senator who led the fight against
the bill was another Republican, Jim Waring of Phoenix.)
Now that we’ve gone
ahead and consubstantiated these matters
with party politics, however, we feel we should point out one other
little
thing that makes all this even more complicated in terms of Left vs.
Right. Over most of
the last two
decades, the standard response of the Left to religious hogwash has
been to
take issue with it not on the grounds that it is false,
but on the grounds that it is oppressive—this
is why ostensibly anti-religious
opinions expressed in academic circles are typically only
anti-Christian opinions;
Christianity
is the powerful, dominant,
majority
religion, and so taking issue with it fits under the P.C. umbrella,
whereas
taking issue with theism in general
would also require calling bullshit
on various minority religions,
which
wouldn’t fly. And
the standard left-wing
critique of Christianity involves pointing out ad
nauseam that it is patriarchal. Only…
here’s that thing we feel like we
should tell you: the thing is, one of the constants that held true
across all the polls we consulted
for this
essay, in relation to every single one
of the absurd beliefs mentioned here, is the fact that a
markedly higher percentage of women believe in them than men. Noah’s Ark,
the Devil, Creationism, you name it—more
American women believe in those
things than do American men.
We don’t really have
a particular agenda connected to this
bit of information. We’re
just tossing
it out there, because it seems like something we should all be thinking
about. For a good
long while now, our
strategy as American Liberals when it comes to criticizing religion has
been to
lead with a charge of sexism… So what do we do with the
fact that American
women are substantially more
religious than American men? And
if
Western religion is so patriarchal
and all, then why is this the case?
It just seems
like we’re not going to make any
headway here unless we start taking this into consideration.
Oh, and speaking of gender
issues, 24% of Americans believe
in witches. Fucking
witches.
But at least this last tidbit
allows us to derive what is
officially our favorite “true statement” from this
entire essay. Assuming
that virtually all of the people
who believe in witches are also
Creationists—which they would pretty much have
to be—it can accurately be said that “roughly
half of all Creationists believe in witches.”
Seriously. Fucking witches.
*This is a joke
about how the list of rules commonly
referred to as the 10 Commandments aren’t actually the 10
Commandments, but
just some stuff that Moses says God said.
The phrase “10 Commandments,”
and the fact of their being on tablets
that Moses schleps down Mt. Sinai, actually appear only in conjunction
with another list of 10 things that
no-one’s
ever heard of. If
you don’t believe us,
read the Book of Exodus. This
just goes
to show you how few people have actually
fucking
read the Bible.
Back to the Top
Comment
on this Essay on MySpace
Back to the Homepage
|
|